« Venture Capital 2.0: Not So Separate, But Still Equal | Main | A Reflection on the Web 2.0 Inflection »

Comments

sourabh niyogi

I had no faith before, having done machine vision in previous life, but the "Searching for images" => "Searching with image" transformation is absolutely great: it is very plausible to believe that an e-retailer can sell N% more stuff by grabbing etsy-like features, powered by riya.

It seems clear that eretailers would demand that image-based "More Like This" be immediately blended with non-image based "More Like This" -- c.f. Aggregate Knowledge in progress -- and fortunately, image processing researchers have no trouble navigating that ship: its just another cue! When that happens, you won't have an "image processing web 2.0 company", but a real winner!

Andrew Fife

Peter:

"what our barriers to entry are (and aren't)"

Do you mean "obstacles" to entry? ;)

-Andrew

Ryan

If you make image searching available as a desktop product where all the information will stay on your computer you can easily sell for $100 a copy. Please don't keep this a web thing only.

david sutherland

I guess I don't get it... I would think you would build core engine(s) and then produce several awesome apps to showcase the engine potential to generate the buzz needed for IPO or selloff. Working so hard on the engine without several awesome showcases...???

My feeling is that people are "wowed" by killer apps not killer engines. The common man has to actually be able to use the product and see the benefit to start showing popular mega-interest.

IMO.

Best wishes.
p.s. I'm greedily wanting to immediately put your technology to use on all sorts of my personal picture archiving!!! Please progress with grace, style and deftness... to speedy implimentations!

The comments to this entry are closed.